ILUA negotiation
Representing Traditional Owner groups in ILUA negotiations with proponents, governments and developers.
Practice Areas
Legal advice and representation for Traditional Owner groups negotiating Indigenous Land Use Agreements with governments, mining companies, renewable energy proponents and other parties.
An Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) is a voluntary arrangement between a native title group and other parties about the use and management of land and waters. Once registered with the National Native Title Tribunal, an ILUA binds all native title holders in the area.
An ILUA is a voluntary agreement between a native title group and other parties, such as government agencies, mining companies, renewable energy proponents, developers or local councils, about the use and management of land and waters. Once registered with the National Native Title Tribunal, the agreement binds all native title holders in the area, including those who did not participate in the negotiation.
ILUAs are one of the most practically significant tools in native title law. They allow native title holders to shape how their Country is used and managed, and they give proponents the certainty they need to proceed with activities that would otherwise require long negotiation under the future act regime.
The Native Title Act 1993 provides for three types of ILUA:
Body corporate agreement. Made with a registered PBC or RNTBC. This is the simplest type and applies where the relevant area has determined native title and an established PBC.
Area agreement. Made where there is no registered body. An area ILUA must be authorised, and all persons who hold or may hold native title in the area must have the opportunity to be involved.
Alternative procedure agreement. Used where the State or Territory and a registered native title body corporate agree to an alternative process for future act approvals.
ILUAs can deal with a wide range of matters:
The terms of an ILUA are negotiated between the parties. The strength of the outcome for native title holders depends significantly on the quality of that negotiation.
An ILUA is only valid if it has been properly authorised by the native title group. Getting this right is critical: an ILUA with a flawed authorisation can be challenged and set aside.
David Saylor advises claim groups on the authorisation process and works with community decision-makers to ensure the agreement has been validly made before it is registered.
If you are a Traditional Owner group facing an ILUA negotiation, or if you have received a proposal from a proponent and want to understand your position, speak with David Saylor before you agree to anything.
Call (07) 4431 0074 or 0474 244 447, or email david@saylorlegal.com.au.
Representing Traditional Owner groups in ILUA negotiations with proponents, governments and developers.
Drafting and reviewing ILUA terms to ensure the agreement protects the interests of native title holders.
Preparing and lodging ILUAs for registration with the National Native Title Tribunal.
Advising on the authorisation process required for a valid ILUA, including meeting procedures and authorisation requirements.
An ILUA is a voluntary agreement between a native title group and other parties about the use and management of land and waters. Once registered with the National Native Title Tribunal, it binds all native title holders in the area, including those who did not sign.
A body corporate ILUA is made with a registered PBC or RNTBC. An area ILUA is made where there is no registered body and must be authorised by the claim group.
An ILUA can consent to acts that would otherwise affect native title, including acts that would extinguish it, but the ILUA itself does not extinguish native title. Clear legal advice on the effect of any proposed terms is essential before the group authorises an ILUA.
Authorisation requirements depend on the type of ILUA. For an area ILUA, all persons who hold or may hold native title in the area must have the opportunity to be involved in the authorisation process.